
Wordpress curation platform in the making?
Once you've built an empire of funny cat pictures and other user-generated comedy ephemera, what do you do next? Ben Huh, CEO of the sprawling Cheezburger network of comedy websites, has begun discussing a side-project he's working on called The Moby Dick Project. The Project's aim is to rebuild online media in a format that's suited for a changed media world. "Why are we still consuming news like it's 1899?" Huh asks in a blog post this morning. "I want to rethink how we read breaking news," he told me by phone today. He's talking with a small group of...
I recently took part in a round-table discussion on “the future of content” — not that I or anyone there has a crystal ball. At one point during the exchange it was suggested that stories written for print — that is, longer-form journalism — don’t work very well on digital platforms. I quickly took exception, knowing that 10 years ago I thought the same thing.
Perhaps not surprisingly, the data from more than 100 million articles on ReadItLater shows that consumers save articles consistently throughout the day. But here’s when they’re reading it: on computers, from 6pm-9pm; on iPhones, at 6am, 9am, 5pm to 6pm and 8pm-10pm (“the moments between tasks and locations”); and on iPads, predominantly from 8pm-10pm. And check out the ReadItLater graph just above that shows both time-shifting and device-shifting for iPad owners reading saved articles.
Forbes Blogger Steals $20,000 and 1 Million Pageviews from New York Times by Changing Headline Now how’s that for a grabber? If it got your attention it just demonstrates how important headlines are in online journalism.
They say a picture is worth a thousand words, but how much is a title worth? If the story that proceeds is any indicator, a title is worth over 6700 words and months of research. It all began Friday when the New York Times published an article “How Companies Learn Your Secrets“. It was an extremely long article which discussed how large companies like WalMart and Target collect data about your individual consumption patterns to figure out how to most efficiently make you happy. It was a great piece but there was one problem: it didn’t have the title it deserved.
The original title was “How Companies Learn Your Secrets.” Kashmir Hill, a writer at Forbes, realized this and quickly developed a condensed version of the article with a far more powerful title: “How Target Figured Out A Teen Girl Was Pregnant Before Her Father Did“. It cut out the crap and got to the real shocker of the story. As of the writing of this story, the New York Times article has 60 likes and shares on Facebook versus 12,902 which the Forbes article has. The Forbes article also has a mind boggling 680,000 page views, a number that can literally make a writer’s career.
This is as clever as it gets.
Specializing in Affordable Short-Run Newspapers! Stop paying for the high cost of newsletters, leaflets or flyers! Be more professional and have more space with a newspaper! One local church profits on their newspaper—the very first day! Just one of the many benefits of a church newspaper. (less than 7 cents per paper) Teach your students not only about writing, communication, graphic arts and more, but raise much needed funds, too! (less than 10 cents per paper) Stop paying for the high cost of Menus! And stop paying for new ones when your costs go up. Turn your menu into a Newspaper!
That is going to take a lot of marketing to take off... but good concept. You could essentially curate the news and make a newspapers out of it that peope could get every Sunday morning. I would read the tech news of the week.
Project Argo is collection of tools and best practices for building topic-focused sites in WordPress.
The code and tutorials that you find on this site were designed to enable a pilot group of 12 NPR member stations to curate and report on news about specific topics of local interest.
The 12 sites the Argo suite was built for encompassed a range of topics, from climate change to local music. Overall, the sites share several key characteristics: frequent publishing, often with several posts a day; robust use of images; and a mix of curatorial and original material. Any topic-focused site that matches these criteria might benefit from our methods, themes or plugins.
Even with the right tools, it's not obvious how to reach a robust audience for a topic. In this section, we share what we've learned during Project Argo, and what we recommend to anyone taking on a topical blogging project.
Longform.org posts new and classic non-fiction articles, curated from across the web by GOOD pals Max Linsky and Aaron Lammer.
Longreads is similar to Longform, and lets you search by article length.
LadyJournos! is curated by GOOD's executive editor Ann Friedman, a go-to source for excellent writing by up-and-coming women journalists.
Give Me Something to Read is a hand-picked selection of articles and essays saved with Instapaper.
The Electric Typewriter has a bit more of an archival feel, reposting many journalistic classics along with some new stuff.
The Best of Journalism is an email-subscription service ($1.99/month) of recommended reading, curated by Atlantic staff writer Conor Friedersdorf.
Techcrunch announced today that Ben Huh (Cheezburger.com) and Matt Galligan (Socialthing, SimpleGeo both sold) joined forces to create Circa (circnews.com).
My question is: do we already know what it will look like? Is this Circa?
More about curation in 2012...
For the last year, much of the focus has been on curating content from the social web and effectively contextualizing disparate pieces of information to form singular stories.
In 2012, there will be even more emphasis not only on curating that content, but also on amplifying it through increasingly effective distribution mechanisms.
Because anyone can publish content today and report information from a breaking news event, the role journalists can play in amplifying — and verifying — that content becomes ever more important.
Here are the keys points:
What distinguishes sites like The Huffington Post from Google is that that instead of using algorithms to aggregate links, they use real live human beings. Much like traditional art curators, these human beings – dare we call them editors? – decide what goes up on the gallery wall and how it is presented.
And if professional editors and clever algorithms aren’t providing this service, then consumers will simply provide it to each other.
To remain relevant, today’s digital media offerings must use the full power of what’s out there to tell stories as effectively and comprehensively as possible, aggregating and contextualising links to both professionally produced and user-generated content.
Everybody is nowadays a journalist ("citizen") or editor because platforms like Shareist allows anyone to reproduce what The Huffington Post does.
This post was originally written by Randy Murray and this is a must-read.
There are times when our use of language shifts and the meaning of words is altered. I typically don’t fight against it. But this current hijacking of the word “curation” to mean “a list of things on other web sites
I have come to think the same way about it: what most people do when they refer to "curation", which is essentially sharing interesting content they find online: posts, articles, media, products, etc... is not curation.
They are "reporting" on something, like Boing Boing, Buzzfeed, HuffPost, Mashable, etc...
Be honest. Providing links and commentary is a valuable service. It is an art form, but it is not curation. Some of my favorite daily reads do just that: sites like Boing Boing, Fark, and MinimalMac are terrific. But they’re not museums or libraries or zoos. They exercise no care or control over the things that they link to. They spread the word, but they preserve nothing.
There’s another, better term that is more accurate, a better fit. It doesn’t sound as highfalutin’, though.
It’s called “reporting.” All of these sites are doing journalism. It’s news, not a museum.
People are reporters/editors, citizen journalists not curators. And that is okay, it's just time to recognize what they really do and call it the right way. Understanding what they do enables service providers to build the tools they need in a format that makes sense for the users.
I think Ben Huh has been right for a while, blogging platforms will shape into reporting/newspaper type of platforms, allowing people to share interesting things they find online (since that is what most do) and not label their efforts as curation. This is what's fun, to feel like you are cresting a newspaper or magazine about topics/subjects you like.
One thing: design will be essential to carry this to the users.
Companies, small or big, bloggers, or individuals will find a platform that fits their needs, not to curate, but to report/share things that matters to or interests them.

Source: http://whowritesforyou.com/2011/11/28/the-case-against-curation/
EDITED:
Others suggest using "editorializing" over "reporting" which i guess makes sense.
I found that as the weeks have worn on, the verification process has become incredibly important to me. I was never trained as a journalist, although I have been working in media and journalism policy for years now. In the end, I think a lot of my motivation for such rigorous fact checking comes from a simple sense of responsibility.
Thomson Reuters bloggers attack Business Insider over fair use of other news stories…
The article was in response to news that Business Insider had raised about $7 million. The 60 strong Business Insider reports that it has more than 12 million pageviews a month, a very strong showing.
Mr McCarthy writes that some of this pageview count is built on the work of others and that some Business Insider stories are mostly rewrites of other news stories.
Mr McCarthy examined another story about an NFL running back and found a similar lack of original content (why did he not question why Business Insider is running sports stories, or stories featuring scantily clad women, such as above?)
But he wonders, “Why does Business Insider risk undermining all that highly original, distinctive content,” when it “over aggregates” original content from others?”
I can answer that one. It’s because of the economics of the online news business.
At the start of the year Mr Blodget revealed Business Insider revenues for 2010 were $4.8 million. The profit was just $2,127. This is not a profitable venture
I suggest that Messrs Salmon and McCarthy follow the money, they’ll get a much better story and then they won’t be puzzled why Business Insider does what it does.
When I started in journalism the answer was everywhere. I was always ripping pages out of newspapers and putting them aside to store later in the box in my flat. I would also contribute to the joint curation effort of my newsroom colleagues by suggesting material to be stored in the filing cabinet in the office. Now there are many great tools, most free to use, that offer different curation benefits.
Can we find clues about the future of news and journalism in the way a link-sharing site like Reddit operates?
I agree with Weinberger that this looks and feels a lot like a form of community journalism, or “crowd-powered” journalism. At the newspaper I used to work for, we used a live-blogging tool called Cover It Live (now owned by Demand Media) to host live discussions with people in the news — eyewitnesses to a news event, scientists who released research reports, and other newsmakers of various kinds — in which readers would ask questions and have them answered.
The UK riots have been such a dynamic and sprawling news event. There’s been a marvellous quantity and granularity to the reporting. It has also helped that such a wide ranging news story happened in one of the great media capitals of the world where domestic and international media organisations, by and large, have some of their best news reporting resources concentrated in one place. Apart from the news reporting by professionals, there’s been an avalanche of citizen journalism – user generated content sourced from amateurs who have been recording what they see around them, in their workplaces and neighbourhoods, on their mobile phones and cameras.
Mark Cuban, Co-Owner of 2929 Productions & Chairman of HDNet - on the The Future of News...
I think the future of news is the branded curation of news.
And he follows on about niche curation...
I think the fastest growing segment of the news business will be individuals who create a brand around their name and a niche about which people trust them to educate or entertainment them.
Print media is on its way out. Long-form stories aren’t being read. We’ve all heard these laments, but don’t fret yourself too crazy. A story in The Atlantic by James Fallows says this at the beginning of an article about the future of journalism: And an essay from Paul Ford in New York Magazine argues that we still require stories to rise out of the constant flow of information. Some newer titles in journalism include social media strategist, multimedia reporter and blogger.
If you look at the list of jobs, it feels to me that journalists will either need training and understanding of SEO and social media. Well, i guess that is all to expect from the new generation.
Interesting platform publish2.com, custom to a specific market.
As Brian pointed out, after a reporter finishes a story, it needs to go to an editor and then to a copy editor. Most Web CMSs are not designed to handle this workflow. You can’t set story status to track where is in the workflow. Editors can’t be notified that stories are ready for review, or are ready for copy editing. Reporters can’t be notified that revisions are required. You can’t manage story assignments. You can’t customize the workflow in any way.
Printing pages...
A key function of the print editorial system is to flow content, properly formatted, onto pages in InDesign and Quark. These systems can also sync edits made on the designed page (e.g. making it fit) back into the database. Many of these systems handle high resolution photos, also necessary for print, but not the web.
How BBC handled citizen journalism